Two of my six 7th grade classes are extremely difficult. Forty minutes with a variety of learning difficulties and behavioral disorders can make me want to hang myself. (I’m doing research on how to deal with ADD. Hopefully it will help both me and the kids.) Yesterday, I did something that was potentially stupid but at the same time very positive with one of those groups.
As you may know, 12 Turkish soldiers were killed near the Iraqi border on Sunday. The following day, many of the kids in one of my classes were excited about the prospect of military retaliation. In particular, A felt it was good and necessary to kill terrorists. He expressed his enthusiasm by shooting a roomful of imaginary terrorists with a gun formed by his hand. Without giving my opinion on the matter, I managed to settle him and several students who vocally supported his actions.
Yesterday, A entered the classroom with a colored map of Turkey, Iraq and surrounding countries. Before the lesson began, he excitedly tried to tell me what he thought was going to happen, what he thought should happen and where the terrorists were. He was trying so hard to express himself in English that I didn’t want to discourage him. At the same time, if one student holds my attention before the lesson begins, the rest of them go completely nuts and are difficult to settle down. I asked him to sit down, but promised we would talk about it later.
I gauged the mood of the class. All of them were interested in what A had to say and wanted to talk. Had I thought that any one of those students would be offended or upset, I would not have touched the subject. The kids clearly felt a need to talk. While the topic is a sensitive and potentially offensive one, I decided to change the lesson plan on the spot. I called A to the front of the class, and told him he could be the teacher for a few minutes. It was his responsibility to tell the others to be quiet if needed. He went through his routine.
B (these are their first initials) who is normally silent unless called upon, felt compelled to join A at the head of the class. He too tried to express himself in English. When the effort was too difficult and his thoughts flowed too quickly, he fell back on Turkish. T translated for us. Everyone listened. No one imitated gunfire. There was more interaction in English during that lesson than in any other before. Although I do not agree with A, B, T, Y nor C’s opinions, I was really proud of them for their effort. And while I don’t agree with them, I think it is important to give kids a forum in which they can express their opinions if they are not violent or overtly offensive. Clearly, their opinions are shaped by their parents and I was therefore careful to remain neutral.
A produced a handwritten list of 100 kids from the 6th-8th grades who wanted to join the Turkish soldiers. Not all of the names were boys’ names. I found that quite interesting.
I found it odd that the PKK was not directly named for the first 15 minutes of the discussion. Whether they assumed we all knew who was responsible for the 12 deaths, I don’t know.
According to A, the terrorists live in Istanbul, Izmir and Ankara. They spend the day in the city and at night go to the mountains to train. Where exactly those mountains are, he could not say.
While remaining neutral, I started to ask them questions. “Who is in the PKK?” “Americans, Russians...” I was the one person who mentioned the word Kurd. Blame was placed on Americans. “The Americans do this, they do that...” I interrupted to remind them that I’m American. A look of surprised realization came over T’s face and she quickly apologised for offending me. I told her no offense was taken and that although I am American, I do not support what my country has done and is doing in Afghanistan and Iraq. Additionally, and I think they understood, I told them that I would never say that Turkey was good or bad, or that the PKK is good or bad. (Really, I’m in no position to say. Nothing is black and white, I haven’t lived with this reality before, and I never want to be one of those foreigners who steps in to say how things should be run. Additionally, I do not pretend to understand the situation.)
I asked if they knew what the PKK wanted. I drew a really bad map of Turkey and made a circle where I think the PKK wants to establish their own country. IP corrected me, took my chalk and drew a line down the middle of my map. When I asked them why they wanted their own country, they stared at me blankly though they understood the question.
To be honest, not much of the discussion made sense to me, yet this was the first time there was a sustained discussion in my class, and it was the first time of few of them voluntarily spoke. For that reason, I was very proud of my kids and told them so. It’s not often they receive compliments.
During the break, I told a few of my fellow teachers about the class. They were horrified. I later told the assistant to the foreign language department director that we had a discussion about the PKK and terrorism and that the kids were amazing. She didn’t recognize the students’ accomplishment in English; in fact, I don’t think she even heard I said it. Understandably. Without getting angry, she firmly told me never to talk about it again, the subject was too sensitive and I could expect angry phone calls from parents. I went back to the teachers’ room fearing that I would be called into someone’s office the following day to answer for my actions, knowing that my students and I nevertheless experienced something positive.
No parent has called so far. I will never touch the subject in class again.
My second potentially stupid action is to post this story on a blog. I’m not so paranoid to think that some government association will track me down to question me about what I’ve written, but I do know that I’ve opened myself to negative criticism, not to mention being called stupid.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Good for you for getting the kids involved in talking about an issue that is important to them! It is really strange to think that we (teachers/adults) shouldn't talk to kids about specific issues because they are too "hot". How are their minds supposed to develop critical thinking skills if we never make them try to think things through or form an arguement for themselves? I suppose it is because parents want their children to have the same ideology...?
Very very interesting.
I think you're amazing for getting through the class without registering any of your own opinions or getting angry. I couldn't do it. In fact I'm having enough trouble disguising my didsain for the free market system with my 1:1 business Enlgish students. It's so hard to remove the political, not to mention psychoanalytic, elements from the teacher-student relationship. Anyway, well done for focusing on their communication needs. At leat they had practice expressing themselves. Or the forces that have formed their selves should I say?
Stupid? Insentitive?
Horsefeathers!
Creative! Sensitive! Professional!
Maybe it would be easier (for the head of the department) if you were to have the students talk about sex or religion.....
You are teaching kids who are at a very formative period. Thank G-d YOU are there teaching them.
Anne in Ardmore
I think it's difficult for us Americans to fully understand how volatile the subject of the "Kurdish problem" is. It's extremely risky for a teacher, especially a foreigner, to approach such a subject, due in part to limitations on what a person can legally say about Turkey while in Turkey. Orhan Pamuk was charged with anti-Turkishness (for lack of a better word) for speaking about the killing of Armenians as genocide. Since the Kurdish question is such a highly charged topic, it is extremely difficult for anyone to remain neutral about it in a discussion. The only comparable topic I can think of in the US would be evolution and "intelligent selection" or whatever that's called these days. I remember my science teachers nervously saying that we were not allowed to talk about evolution during biology classes, and that was in a public school a million years ago. That topic is no where near as touchy as the one I dealt with here.
And yes, part of the problem lies with parents' influence on children. What I find particularly interesting is that it is the more academically challenged students who are openly talking about these current events. The others are far too absorbed in various exams.
I applaud you for attempting this discussion, and I am really pleased to see how it turned out. I tried the same thing a few years ago, well actually, the topic came up organically during discussion, but I went with it. This was a university classroom, with several Kurds, several girls with headscarves, a few nationalists, and many in between. It turned into a shouting match. I guess I mean to say that broaching a potentially volatile subject in the classroom often works if one side is allowed to dominate, as with your 7th graders, but is more difficult when ideas (or ideology) are varied and already entrenched. If you want to work up to that level of involvement (in English!), I would suggest taking another volatile topic from a different country, with issues the students can relate to, and have the students role play (politicians, civilians, soldiers, etc). Eventually you may even be able to broach the topic of Iraq and the Kurds, but perhaps this is wishful thinking. Sadly, you will never be officially allowed to discuss the Kurds in Turkey, at least not for a few years yet.
Thank you Alethia for your comment.
If I try to broach another contraversial but non-Turkish subject, I am not sure this group of kids will be able to wrap their brains around it. Not only is their level of English below their peers, but they have real difficulty with critical and abstract thinking. On the other hand, role playing might just be the way to go. With a whole lot of scaffolding, they might be able to do it.
Any suggestions for topics would be appreciated!
I was thinking about what is most important to your students, and I bet it would be their parents, grandparents, and/or extended families. You could generate a discussion on what to do with family members as they age or get sick, especially in the urban lifestyle. This is currently a problem in Asia, with the fast-developing China, and the already developed Japan. Or you could take the falling birth rate in Germany, since Turkey is currently experiencing an East/West divide on family size. What to do with an economy that is faltering because there aren't enough people? immigration, family planning policies, etc. Another topic might be working mothers and their roles as moms, careerwomen, wives, cooks, maids, etc, a biggie for the US, and fast becoming a real source of divorce in urban Turkey. One last topic could revolve around identity and how it is changed with immigration: should you continue the traditions of your country? should you teach your children Turkish? how many times should you travel home each year? This is a topic in the US and Europe, especially when people are discriminated against for being Muslim (France and its violent suburban riots come to mind).
The scaffolding would be tricky, because of the low level of English, but I bet photos and cartoons might be helpful in that regard, with an introduction to relevant phrases through grammar or vocab exercises.
I hope all this is helpful - sorry for rambling on!
Alethia,
Again thanks. Your suggestions are great, especially in terms of personalisation. I'll try to work some of these ideas within the course of the term. This will be tricky as I've got some rather odd parameters to work with (the CEF combined with a TESL text book. Talk about square pegs and round holes.
I'd be very grateful if you'd send me your e-mail address via a comment. I won't post it, but would love to ask you about your experiences in Turkey. If you don't want to, understood.
One last thing. The riots in France would be an interesting topic insofar as it's an Islamic one in a different context. I'm not so sure I'd want to broach it in a class of these 7th graders as the questions raised are quite different than those raised in Turkey and are difficult for me to talk about. (I lived in Paris for a while and have mixed views on the whole thing.)
One last thing. The riots in France would be an interesting topic insofar as it's an Islamic one in a different context. I'm not so sure I'd want to broach it in a class of these 7th graders as the questions raised are quite different than those raised in Turkey and are difficult for me to talk about. (I lived in Paris for a while and have mixed views on the whole thing.)
One last thing. The riots in France would be an interesting topic insofar as it's an Islamic one in a different context. I'm not so sure I'd want to broach it in a class of these 7th graders as the questions raised are quite different than those raised in Turkey and are difficult for me to talk about. (I lived in Paris for a while and have mixed views on the whole thing.)
Post a Comment